The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said female employees at a San Diego-area country club were subjected to ongoing sexual harassment by a manager who gave preferential treatment to those who accepted his advances, according to a complaint filed in California federal court.
Paul Hastings partner Felicia A. Davis helped narrow a suit accusing Google Inc. of underpaying women in California and beat back a sweeping Fair Credit Reporting Act class action brought on behalf of roughly 20,000 Disneyland job applicants, securing herself a place among five employment attorneys honored by Law360 as Rising Stars.
The New Jersey Legislature properly invoked the Legislative Review Clause in invalidating a rule from the state Civil Service Commission that enabled certain public employees to be promoted without competitive examinations, because the provision ran afoul of state law, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.
Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP urged a California appeals court Wednesday to find it doesn’t owe a legal recruiter $335,000 for connecting the firm with its now managing partner-elect, arguing a jury found the recruiter didn’t fulfill his deal with Manatt and there was no evidence that was the firm’s fault.
An Idaho federal judge whose new law clerk’s brother is the Title IX compliance officer at Brigham Young University-Idaho said Tuesday the clerk "will be screened from ... and will not be involved with" a woman's lawsuit accusing the school of failing to report a sexually abusive professor.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said that female employees at the Albuquerque branch of a chain of Mexican-themed sports bars experienced sexual harassment that created a hostile work environment, accusing the company of failing to take action in a complaint filed Wednesday in New Mexico federal court.
The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday reversed a lower court's decision to remand a trucker’s putative wage and hour class action against Swift Transportation to California state court, finding the trucking company showed potential damages exceed the $5 million threshold for federal class actions when including future recoverable attorneys' fees.
Overland Solutions Inc. struck a $2.4 million deal Wednesday with a proposed class of insurance inspectors who claim they were misclassified as independent contractors and denied proper wages, sending the deal to a California state judge for approval.
The resounding defeat Tuesday of a Missouri ballot measure that would have banned making workers pay for union representation shows that after a recent wave of state laws targeting union fees and a big U.S. Supreme Court win for foes of organized labor, the "right-to-work" movement may be losing traction, experts say.
Elite high school and college basketball players may seek advice from agents to make decisions about their potential professional careers, and school presidents will be held to a higher standard of accountability for rule violations as part of reforms adopted by the NCAA on Wednesday amid an ongoing federal probe into bribery and corruption in the sport.
The Manhattan federal judge overseeing the bribery trial of former union boss Norman Seabrook was curious Wednesday about the $60,000 allegedly paid to Seabrook in exchange for a hedge fund investment, pressing a key witness on how that much cash could have been stuffed in a small-sized “man-purse.”
New York City on Wednesday became the first major U.S. city to curb the number of Uber, Lyft and similar for-hire vehicles on its roads after the City Council approved a one-year freeze on issuing new licenses to app-based ride-hailing services, while also setting a wage base for drivers.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Wednesday said it has filed suit against the operator of a now-shuttered Piggly Wiggly in Hogansville, Georgia, claiming the grocery store refused to take action when two female employees complained of sexual harassment and ultimately fired the victims for speaking up.
A New Jersey appeals court on Wednesday affirmed the Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.'s trial win in a suit brought by a former train conductor who said her shoulder was badly injured when she opened a stuck door between cars.
A New York federal judge incorrectly pulled the plug on a wage and hour class action by laundromat workers just a week before a scheduled trial after determining on her own accord they had abandoned their federal claims without giving them a chance to weigh in, the Second Circuit ruled Wednesday.
A California federal judge on Tuesday decertified an approximately 11,000-strong class of J.B. Hunt Transport Inc. drivers accusing the trucking giant of shorting them on wages, meal and rest breaks, saying there are too many variations in how the company's piece-rate compensation system was applied.
A California federal judge granted class certification Wednesday to some claims that H&M doesn't pay workers for time spent in security checks, finding under the California Supreme Court’s recent Troester v. Starbucks decision that the clothing chain can't argue its inspections were too short to trigger legal liability.
A proposed nationwide class of hourly employees at Papa John's has asked a California federal court to conditionally certify a lawsuit claiming the workers were stiffed on minimum wages because the pizza chain forced them to complete mandatory off-the-clock training on its corporate website.
Katz Marshall & Banks LLP partner Alexis Ronickher has successfully represented clients in sexual discrimination and harassment cases, including a former congressional staffer who brought allegations against then-Congressman Patrick Meehan, and in whistleblower actions, making her one of five employment attorneys under age 40 honored as a Law360 Rising Star.
The D.C. United professional soccer team can't duck a suit over a player with violent tendencies who hit a teammate so hard he suffered a career-ending concussion, a Washington, D.C., federal court said on Wednesday, sweeping aside the team's preemption arguments thanks in large part to a tactical error.
Since the GOP’s failed attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act last year and the elimination of the individual mandate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Republicans and Democrats have struggled to address problems in the health care system. Although bills recently passed by the House contain a few provisions with bipartisan support, they face an uphill battle for passage in the Senate, says Radha Mohan at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP.
With the imminent possibility of widespread legalized gambling following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Murphy, the NCAA’s mission to protect the “amateur” athlete is exponentially harder, say Elizabeth McCurrach and Ronald Gaither of BakerHostetler.
Although Fair Labor Standards Act collective claims and Rule 23 wage and hour class claims often involve overlapping factual circumstances, it's important not to lose sight of the independent hurdles each presents to litigators, and the way they interact in a hybrid suit. In the final part of this article, attorneys with Jones Day share key strategies to consider at different stages of litigation.
In Dutta v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the district court’s decision granting summary judgment to State Farm in a putative Fair Credit Reporting Act class action. The decision presents another helpful application of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2016 Spokeo opinion, say attorneys at Troutman Sanders LLP.
Regulators are taking new and aggressive steps to address the purported use of "no poach" agreements that allegedly violate antitrust law. Apart from ensuring that current practices comply with state and federal laws, companies should make sure that their insurance policies can help mitigate risk from prior practices, say Jeff Kiburtz and Heather Habes of Covington & Burling LLP.
There are several key considerations when handling a hybrid Fair Labor Standards Act and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 wage and hour class and collective action. Attorneys with Jones Day provide an overview of the procedural steps and legal standards involved in litigation, strategies to consider at each stage of the case, and practical guidance on litigating such claims.
In Lamps Plus v. Varela, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide next term whether an arbitration agreement that says nothing about class arbitration can be interpreted to constitute consent by the parties. But it's currently unclear if the Supreme Court will specify who can actually decide that question, says Gilbert Samberg of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC.
A California appellate court's recent opinion in AHMC Healthcare v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County is helpful for employers that use time-rounding systems. The discussion of the statistical criteria required to establish that such practices are neutral is particularly useful, say Andrea Calem and Roland Juarez of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP.
Recently, courts across the country have seen an increase in employment law claims, a high percentage of which are resolved through the mediation process. In this article, Frank Burke of ADR Services Inc. shares best practices for planning, strategy and mediation advocacy in the employment law arena.
The recent emergence of artificial intelligence-based technology has prompted serious concerns about the future integrity of recordings. Attorneys must think critically about standards for authenticating audio and video evidence as well as legislative and regulatory safeguards to discourage pervasive manipulation and forgery, says Jonathan Mraunac of Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart PC.