Pa. Justices Say Court, Not Jury, Must Interpret Farm Law

By Alex Wolf (December 22, 2015, 5:15 PM EST) -- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Monday that a court, not a jury, should determine whether a farm's use of sewage sludge as fertilizer should be shielded from public nuisance actions, overturning an appellate ruling and upholding the biosolids' use as a "normal agricultural operation."

In a unanimous ruling, the high court said a lawsuit against a Pennsylvania farm and its fertilizer supplier, a Synagro Technologies Inc. unit, was barred by the state's Right to Farm Act. The justices found that a lower court was correct in not only taking on the role of deciding the case, but also ruling that the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!