Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Ahne Ji x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Copyright | New York Eastern
Order(Other)
ORDER re 22 : The parties report progress with discovery but little progress with settlement discussions. The Court strongly encourages the parties to continue settlement discussions. All remaining deadlines in the Court's 04/21/2026 Minute Entry & Order are in effect. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marcia M. Henry on 10/01/2026. (BMF)
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Eastern
Scheduling Order
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference will be held on November 16, 2026, at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks via the Court's Video Zoom. The Court will e-mail the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Parties shall comply with Judge Wicks' Individual Rules regarding Expectations for Remote Appearances (see Rule § 1E).
Following the conference, the Court will issue an Initial Discovery Order tailored to the circumstances of this FLSA case. As such, counsel need not prepare a discovery worksheet prior to the Initial Conference.
Counsel for the parties are further directed to review Docket Entry No. 3 , concerning the assignment of a Magistrate Judge to oversee this case and Administrative Order No. 2025-14. By November 23, 2026, the parties MUST review and file EITHER the Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form consenting to the jurisdiction of the undersigned OR the Direct Assignment Program Acknowledgement form that confirms that they have conferred with each other and their respective client(s) regarding the option to consent to the undersigned. If the parties do not consent to the undersigned by the date set forth above, and have filed the Direct Assignment Program Acknowledgement form, the Clerk of Court will be directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this case. In that event, this Court will remain on the case and preside over all non-dispositive pretrial matters unless the assigned District Judge orders otherwise. The parties are advised that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are free to withhold consent without any adverse substantive consequences.
So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 10/1/2026. (ELR)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.