Case Activity (17663)

1. Order | Filed: July 13, 2026 | Entered: July 13, 2026 Hayato Ono v. The Honest Company, Inc., et al

   Stockholders Suits | California Central

   Settlement Attorney Fees

   ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court hereby approves the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that the Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate to each of the Settling Parties, and further finds that the Settlement is in the best interests of Honest and its stockholders (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFICS AS ENUMERATED HEREIN). The California Federal Action and all claims contained therein, as well as all of the Released Claims against Released Persons, are dismissed with prejudice. The Settling Parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided below. The Court hereby approves the sum of one million one hundred ninety-five thousand dollars ($1,195,000.00) for the payment of Plaintiffs' Counsel's attorneys fees and expenses in the Derivative Matters and finds that the Fee and Expense Amount is fair and reasonable. No other fees, costs, or expenses may be awarded to Plaintiffs' Counsel in connection with the Settlement. The Fee and Expense Amount shall be distributed in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation. 11. The Court hereby approves the service awards of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each of the Stockholders to be paid from Stockholders Counsels Fee and Expense Amount in recognition of Stockholders participation and effort in the creation of the benefits of the Settlement.This Judgment is a final judgment, and the Court finds that no just reason exists for delay in entering the Judgment in accordance with the Stipulation. Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby directed to enter this Judgment forthwith in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Honest shall lodge this Order and Final Judgment in the other shareholder derivative actions subject to this global settlement, Bisch v. Vlahos, No. 22STCP00015 (L.A. Cnty. Super. Ct.), and Butler v. Vlahos, No. 1:22-cv-01373-RGA (D. Del.). Should the court presiding over either action issue an order other than one granting the parties anticipated stipulations of dismissal, Honest shall lodge that order with this Court within three days of receipt. The Court expressly reserves discretion to vacate this Order and Final Judgment if either court elects to review the global settlement. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) Modified on 7/13/2026 (lc).

2. Misc | Filed: July 13, 2026 | Entered: July 13, 2026 Justesen v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company

   P.I.: Other | Montana

   Statement of Undisputed Fact - MT Statement of Disputed Facts - MT

   Statement of Undisputed Fact re: 13 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment by Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company, Statement of Disputed Facts re: 9 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit G - Affidavit of Lorello, # 2 Exhibit H - Recorded Statement, # 3 Exhibit I - Underlying Complaint) (Jensen, Brett)

3. 17661 additional result(s)