Case Activity (17416)

1. Order | Filed: October 15, 2026 | Entered: October 15, 2026 Steed v. MetroHealth System, et al.

   Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act | Ohio Northern

   Order on Motion to withdraw as attorney

   Order [non-document] The Praecipe to Withdraw[] Appearance of Peter J. Ennis is granted. (Doc. No. 60 .) The Court hereby allows Attorney Ennis to withdraw as attorney of record on behalf of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/15/2026.(P,K)

2. Order | Filed: October 15, 2026 | Entered: October 15, 2026 Steed v. MetroHealth System, et al.

   Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act | Ohio Northern

   Order

   Order [non-document] The Court has reviewed Defendants' Position Paper Regarding Dr. Steed's Failure to Produce Discovery ("Defendants' Position Paper") (Doc. No. 59 ) and Plaintiffs Position Paper in Response to Defendants Position Paper ("Plaintiff's Responsive Position Paper") (Doc. No. 61 ). First, this Court rejects Defendants' request that this Court dismiss the action should Plaintiff not complete her production by November 1, 2026. (Doc. No. 59 , PageID# 1653.) Second, this Court directs the parties to meet and confer by Monday, October 19, 2026 on the following deadlines and matters raised by Plaintiff in her Responsive Position Paper. Therein, Plaintiff proposes the following deadlines: (1) Charles River Associates' ("CRA") logical collection of Plaintiff's phone and collection of Plaintiff's Gmail account by October 31, 2026; and (2) Plaintiff's application of the agreed search terms, production of responsive documents, re-production of the original production in an ESI Protocol-compliant form, along with a privilege log in the format requested in Defendants' January 30, 2026 email on or before November 14, 2026. (Doc. No. 61 , PageID# 1680.) Plaintiff also proposes a deadline for collection of her laptop should the Court require it. (Id.) However, before this Court can reach that issue, the parties are directed to meet and confer as to whether Defendants are requesting CRA's collection of the laptop, despite Plaintiff's averment that "[t]he laptop that I discussed with my attorney was never used for any Metro-related communications [and] was shared by family members." (Doc. No. 61 -1, at 9.) If the parties agree regarding the collection of the laptop, they should discuss whether Plaintiff can obtain the laptop, by shipping or another means, by an earlier date as collection of the laptop should occur before Plaintiff completes the collection process and sends a privilege log to Defendants. At the meet and confer, the parties should also propose new fact discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. The parties are directed to file on the docket a status report by Tuesday, October 20, 2026, alerting the Court to the outcome of the meet and confer. Judge Pamela A. Barker on 10/15/2026. (P,K)

3. 17414 additional result(s)