Law360 - The Newswire for Business Lawyers

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Law360 Law360
  Sign In
Close
  • Law360
  • Law360 UK
  • Law360 Pulse
  • Law360 Employment Authority
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 Insurance Authority
  • Law360 Real Estate Authority
  • Law360 Healthcare Authority
  • Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
  • Products
  • Lexis®
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 In-Depth
  • Law360 Podcasts
  • Rankings
  • Leaderboard Analytics
  • Regional Powerhouses
  • Law360's MVPs
  • Women in Law Report
  • Law360 400
  • Diversity Snapshot
  • Practice Groups of the Year
  • Rising Stars
  • Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
  • Sections
  • Adv. Search & Platform Tools
  • About all sections
  • Browse all sections
  • Banking
  • Bankruptcy
  • Class Action
  • Competition
  • Employment
  • Energy
  • Expert Analysis
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Product Liability
  • Securities
  • Beta Tools
  • Track docs
  • Track attorneys
  • Track judges
  • Site Menu
  • Join the Law360 team
  • Search legal jobs
  • Learn more about Law360
  • Read testimonials
  • Contact Law360
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Law360 Company
  • About Law360 Authority
  • Resource Library
  • Site Map
  • Help
Intellectual Property Securities Bankruptcy Competition Pulse Artificial Intelligence Law360 UK || See all sections ||

Searching dockets in Dolan Law Pc

 

Law360

|

The Practice of Law

Access to Justice Aerospace & Defense Appellate Asset Management Banking Bankruptcy Benefits California Cannabis Capital Markets Class Action Colorado Commercial Contracts Competition Compliance Connecticut Construction Consumer Protection Corporate Criminal Practice Cybersecurity & Privacy Delaware Employment
Energy Environmental Fintech Florida Food & Beverage Georgia Government Contracts Health Hospitality Illinois Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Legal Ethics Legal Industry Life Sciences Massachusetts Media & Entertainment Mergers & Acquisitions Michigan Native American
New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Private Equity Product Liability Project Finance Public Policy Real Estate Retail & E-Commerce Securities Sports & Betting Tax Technology Telecommunications Texas Transportation Trials Washington White Collar

Law360 Pulse

|

Business of Law

California Pulse Connecticut Pulse Courts DC Pulse Daily Litigation Delaware Pulse
Florida Pulse Georgia Pulse In-House Insights Legal Tech & AI Mid-Law
Modern Lawyer New Jersey Pulse New York Pulse Pennsylvania Pulse Small Law Texas Pulse

Law360 Authority

|

Deep News & Analysis

Tax Authority

Federal International State & Local

Employment Authority

Discrimination Labor Other Wage & Hour

Insurance Authority

General Liability Other Property Specialty Lines

Real Estate Authority

Commercial Other Residential

Bankruptcy Authority

Large Cap Mid Cap

Healthcare Authority

Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & Compliance

Law360 Global Products

Law360 UK

Commercial Litigation UK Corporate Crime & Compliance UK Employment UK
Financial Services UK Insurance UK Intellectual Property UK
Property & Construction UK Pulse UK Transactions UK

Law360 Australia

Commercial Disputes AU Financial Services AU

Please assign a name to this alert

All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes

Case Activity (543)

  1. Order | Filed: September 23, 2026 | Entered: September 23, 2026 Kainz et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al

    Civil Rights: Jobs | Illinois Central

    Order on Motion to Amend/Correct ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

    TEXT ORDER: Defendants' 216 Joint Motion to Clarify Expert Discovery Deadlines is GRANTED. The parties' 212 Joint Discovery Plan proposed competing schedules for expert discovery, with Defendants proposing sequential disclosures and Plaintiffs proposing simultaneous disclosures. The Court has considered Plaintiffs' arguments in their 220 response and adopts Defendants' proposed sequential schedule. Under a sequential approach, the party bearing the burden of proof on an issue ordinarily discloses its expert testimony on that issue first. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) advisory committee's note to 1993 amendment ("[I]n most cases, the party with the burden of proof on an issue should disclose its expert testimony on that issue before other parties are required to make their disclosures with respect to that issue."). Plaintiffs contend that simultaneous disclosures are appropriate because Defendants bear the burden on their affirmative defenses. Plaintiffs' general reliance on Defendants' burden as to affirmative defenses does not establish a basis for requiring simultaneous expert disclosures. Moreover, although qualified immunity is an affirmative defense, once raised, the burden shifts to Plaintiffs to defeat it. See Taylor v. City of Milford, 10 F.4th 800, 806 (7th Cir. 2021). The Court therefore finds no sufficient basis to depart from sequential expert disclosures. Accordingly, the expert discovery schedule is as follows: (1) Plaintiffs shall disclose their experts on or before March 18, 2027; (2) Plaintiffs shall disclose their expert reports on or before April 19, 2027; (3) Plaintiffs' experts shall be deposed on or before May 18, 2027; (4) Defendants shall disclose their experts on or before June 21, 2027; (5) Defendants shall disclose their expert reports on or before July 19, 2027; and (6) Defendants' experts shall be deposed on or before August 18, 2027. All other discovery deadlines set forth in the Court's May 27, 2026 Text Order, including the dispositive motion deadline of September 23, 2027, remain in place. Entered by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Hanna on 9/23/2026. (ECJ)

  2. Response | Filed: September 17, 2026 | Entered: September 17, 2026 Kainz et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al

    Civil Rights: Jobs | Illinois Central

    Response to Motion/Petition

    RESPONSE to Motion re 216 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 210 Order,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,,, Joint Motion to Clarify Expert Discovery Deadlines filed by Plaintiffs Sara Bailey, Rebecca Buczkowski, Sabrina Drysdale, Heather Kainz, Rebekah McGrath. (Bolanos, Maria DE Las Nieves)

  3. 541 additional result(s)

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Archive of over 450,000 articles
  • Database of over 2.1 million cases
  • Full-text search of patent complaints
  • Full-text search of PTAB cases and documents
  • Database of TTAB cases and documents, including full-text search of documents
  • Customized email alerts and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View full search results

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Register Now!

Sign up now for free access to this content

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.

You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.

We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Register

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In
RELX Group Lexis Nexis

© 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Careers at Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Trust Center | Cookie Settings | Processing Notice | Ad Choices | Help | Site Map | Resource Library | Law360 Company | Testimonials