Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
DTO Law
-
Stipulation | Filed: May 03, 2024 | Entered: May 03, 2024 Carolyn Clark et al v. Incomm Financial Services, Inc.
Contract: Other | California Central
Continue
STIPULATION to Continue Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, to Deny Class Certification and Scheduling Conference from June 10, 2024 and May 20, 2024 respectively to June 17, 2024 and May 28, 2024, respectively Re: Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only 156 , SEALED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative to Deny Class Certification re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 151 152 filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Clark. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(LippSmith, Graham)
-
Motion | Filed: May 02, 2024 | Entered: May 02, 2024 Heagney et al v. John Paul Mitchell Systems
Contract: Other | California Northern
Discovery Letter Brief
Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Kerrie Gonnella, Rica Guerrero, Randall Heagney, John Rohloff, Jewel Rule. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Proposed Order, # 6 Proposed Order)(Carey, Robert) (Filed on 5/2/2024)
-
Order | Filed: May 01, 2024 | Entered: May 02, 2024 Diece-Lisa Industries, Inc. v. Disney Store USA et al
Trademark | California Central
Summary Judgment
ORDER, 382 by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr: It is Ordered, sua sponte, that Diece-Lisas claim for unfair competition, in violation of California's common law and Cal. Bus. and Prof. § 17200, et seq., be, and hereby is, Dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of equitable jurisdiction. It is further Ordered that the Disney Defendants motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, Denied. It is further Ordered that the Disney Defendants alternative motion for partial summary judgment on the ground that Diece-Lisas claims against Disney Consumer Products and Disney Enterprises are time barred as to the alleged infringements that occurred before February 12, 2017, be, and hereby is, Granted. It is further Ordered that the Disney Defendants alternative motion for partial summary judgment on the ground that Diece-Lisa is not entitled to seek a disgorgement remedy be, and hereby is, Denied. (shb)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login