Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Friedman Feeney x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Jobs | New Hampshire
Order on Motion for Leave to File
ENDORSED ORDER granting in part re 25 Assented to MOTION for Leave to File exceeding page limit or file statement of facts separately. Text of Order: Granted, only in part. If, as plaintiff's counsel claims, defendant's claimed "undisputed facts" are in fact largely disputed on the summary judgment record, consequences for the defendant and counsel will ensue, likely in the form of fee-shifting, because the FRCP and this court's local rules require that only undisputed fact be presented at summary judgment. Should the defendant's counsel need to correct the defendant's summary judgement filing(s) to account for this procedural requirement, defendant's counsel should seek leave to do so. As for the plaintiff, the court first notes that the court's Second Procedural Order on Summary Judgment (Doc 24 ) has uniformly shortened and streamlined summary judgment memoranda in the cases on its docket (which was and is the very intent of the order), not lengthened them. The court notes that the defendant required no such expansion of briefing limits. So the court rejects that argument as grounds for relief. In order to avoid being overly dismissive of the plaintiff's claimed need for relief, the court extends the page limitation by 10 pages (totaling 35 pages), which may be presented in a single document or two (as requested), whichever counsel prefers. If anything in this order concerns counsel about regarding how they have approached this motion practice (as it well might), counsel may arrange with the Deputy Clerk for a conference with the court, conducted by video unless counsel prefer in-person. So Ordered by Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(ko)
As for the plaintiff, the court first notes that the court's Second Procedural Order on Summary Judgment (Doc 24 ) has uniformly shortened and streamlined summary judgment memoranda in the cases on its docket (which was and is the very intent of the order), not lengthened them. The court notes that the defendant required no such expansion of briefing limits. So the court rejects that argument as grounds for relief. In order to avoid being overly dismissive of the plaintiff's claimed need for relief, the court extends the page limitation by 10 pages (totaling 35 pages), which may be presented in a single document or two (as requested), whichever counsel prefers. If anything in this order concerns counsel about regarding how they have approached this motion practice (as it well might), counsel may arrange with the Deputy Clerk for a conference with the court, conducted by video unless counsel prefer in-person.
Leave to File
Assented to MOTION for Leave to File exceeding page limit or file statement of facts separately filed by Frank Groeber. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed order)(Whitcomb, Joseph)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.