Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Gesund Pailet x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Fraud | Nevada
Response
RESPONSE to 193 Motion to Dismiss, by Plaintiff Anthony Mitchell. Replies are due by 10/8/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Anthony Mitchell, # 2 Index of Grounds, # 3 Index - Table of Contents, # 4 Index of Authorities)(Mitchell, Anthony)
Contract: Other | New York Eastern
Status Report Order
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' most recent letter regarding their latest discovery dispute. See DE 89 . It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs Outstanding Discovery Items. Id. at 1. Plaintiff identifies five categories of outstanding discovery requests and unanswered interrogatory questions (id. at 1-2), but Defendants suggest that some or all of these requests do not comply with the Courts 2/27/2026 Order "[t]he parties are PROHIBITED from seeking any discovery not identified in DE 66 ." Plaintiff shall advise the Court whether or not the aforementioned "Outstanding Discovery Items" (DE 89 at 1-2) are specifically included in the list of "Plaintiff's Remaining Fact Discovery" (DE 66 ). Furthermore, Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's arguments that Plaintiff's requested discovery is overbroad. See DE 89 at 2-3. Plaintiff shall address the points above clearly, directly and succinctly in a letter limited to three pages (with no exhibits) to be submitted on 10/16/2026. No reply from Defendants shall be permitted absent leave of the Court. 2. Depositions of Plaintiff, Martin Borda and Shea Curran. Id. at 4. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the scheduling of these depositions and address this in a joint status report due 10/16/2026. 3. Third Party Discovery. Id. at 4-5. Plaintiff purports to seek documents and depositions from third parties, but the Court previously ordered that "[n]o third party discovery shall be permitted until any and all discovery between the parties is first completed." 2/27/2026 Order. That prohibition remains in place at this time.4. Motion for Disqualification of Counsel. DE 89 at 5. Defendants apparently intend to seek disqualify Plaintiff's new counsel Melody Sakhai. Any such motion should be submitted to the undersigned on 10/16/2026 in letter format consistent with the undersigned's Individual Practice Rule VI.A. See Judge Joan M. Azrack's Individual Practice Rule IV.A.13 (directing motions to disqualify counsel to the assigned magistrate judge).5. Scheduling. The deadlines for fact discovery, expert discovery, and motion to dismiss briefing were adjourned in light of the unsuccessful Settlement Conference. See DE 82 ; DE 88 . The parties' aforementioned joint status report (which is due 10/16/2026 and is limited to three pages with no exhibits) shall address these scheduling issues.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 10/1/2026. (GAW)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.