Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Griffin Fletcher
-
Appeal | Filed: February 12, 2020 | Entered: February 12, 2020 Ina Group, LLC. v. Patel et al
Real Property: Other | Ohio Southern
USCA Order
ORDER of USCA Accordingly, we are without jurisdiction to review the remand order and DISMISS this appeal as to 12 Notice of Appeal filed by Denise Harrison Note: No Mandate to issue. (pb)
-
Order | Filed: November 27, 2019 Ina Group, LLC. v. Patel et al
Real Property: Other | Ohio Southern
Order
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 15 Report and Recommendation denying 13 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Michael R. Barrett on 11/27/19. (ba)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
-
Motion | Filed: October 21, 2019 | Entered: October 21, 2019 Ina Group, LLC. v. Patel et al
Real Property: Other | Ohio Southern
Report and Recommendations
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis filed by Defendant Denise Harrison. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT Defendant Denise Harrison's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis be DENIED. Pursuant to FRAP 24(a)(4), Defendant may file, within 30 days after service of the District Court's Order adopting this Report and Recommendation, a motion with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal. Defendant's motion must include a copy of the affidavit filed in the District Court and this Court's statement as to the reasons for denying pauper status on appeal. Defendant is notified that if she does not file a motion within 30 days of receiving notice of the District Court's decision as required by FRAP 24(a)(5) or fails to pay the required filing fee of $455.00 within this same time period, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Once dismissed for want of prosecution, the appeal will not be reinstated, even if the filing fee or motion for pauper status is subsequently tendered, unless Defendant can demonstrate that she did not receive notice of the District Court's decision within the time period prescribed for by FRAP 24(a)(5). Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on 10/21/2019. (km)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login