Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Harvey & Vallini
-
Order | Filed: September 01, 2016 | Entered: September 01, 2016 Anderson v. Bed Bath and Beyond Inc et al
P.I.: Other | South Carolina
Order Dismissing Case 60 Day Settlement Order
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable C Weston Houck on 9/1/2016. (vdru, )
-
Response | Filed: July 28, 2016 | Entered: July 28, 2016 Anderson v. Bed Bath and Beyond Inc et al
P.I.: Other | South Carolina
Reply to Response to Motion
REPLY to Response to Motion re 93 MOTION for Summary Judgment Response filed by Bed Bath and Beyond Inc. (Brogdon, James)
-
Response | Filed: July 18, 2016 | Entered: July 18, 2016 Anderson v. Bed Bath and Beyond Inc et al
P.I.: Other | South Carolina
Response in Opposition to Motion
RESPONSE in Opposition re 93 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Bed Bath & Beyond Response filed by Pansy Anderson.Reply to Response to Motion due by 7/28/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Farrell, John)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login