Case Activity (1581)

1. Order | Filed: September 04, 2026 | Entered: September 04, 2026 Richardson v. Pham et al

   Other Fraud | Connecticut

   Order

   ORDER re: 133 Bill of Costs. Rule 54(a)1 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the District of Connecticut provides that "[any party who seeks costs in the District Court shall, within fourteen (14) days after the District Court judgment becomes final due to the expiration of the appeal period... or the issuance of a mandate by a federal appellate Court, file with the Clerk and serve on all other parties a verified bill of costs.]" The plaintiff, Neil Richardson, served and filed a bill of costs on May 14, 2026, after the defendants filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 133.) The filing is therefore premature under Local Rule 54(a)1, and costs are accordingly denied without prejudice. See, e.g., Collins v. Fed. Express Corp., No. 3:22-cv-1472 (VDO), slip op. (D. Conn. June 4, 2024) (denying costs when bill was filed after notice of appeal, without prejudice to renewal upon issuance of the mandate). Following the issuance of a mandate by the federal appellate Court, the prevailing party(ies) may file a bill of costs pursuant to the rule. It is so ordered.
   Signed by Clerk on 9/4/26.(rw)

2. Response | Filed: September 02, 2026 | Entered: September 02, 2026 BYOAPPS, LLC v. Timeless Cosmetics, LLC et al

   Contract: Other | California Central

   Objection/Opposition (Motion related)

   OBJECTION in support of re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the claims asserted in the Amended Complaint 54 Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff's Evidence in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Alex Pedersen, Veronica Pedersen, Timeless Cosmetics, LLC, Timeless Skin Care, LLC. (Melamed, Samuel)

3. 1579 additional result(s)