Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Howd Ludorf x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | Connecticut
Order
ORDER granting Defendants' motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 98 , 99 , and 100 ; denying Plaintiff's motion for a hearing, ECF No. 109 . Imagine two adults, each seemingly-healthy homeowners in America -- Connect icut no less! Surrounded by peace, but with the opportunity for conflict residing just a few houses away. They can move freely about this vast and glorious nation or enjoy the tranquility of their own space. And yet, they both choose conflict. Repeatedly. This is the tale of Cameron v. Stebbins, et al., in which two individuals (each a public servant) appeal to other public servants with their personal grievances about their neighbor, seeking their own vision of justice. For the undersigned, this evokes two personal memories: one from an elementary school video in which a wise kindergartener explains that she learned one must not tattle, though it is permissible to report; and another from a judge who previously had served a family court assignment and recounted how two litigants were so impossibly litigious that neither wanted to show any semblance of compromise, thus compelling the judge to consider awarding the forks to one, the spoons to the other, and ordering tha t they split the knives. Thankfully, neighborly peace need not be a zero-sum scenario, and the court hopes that the entire neighborhood in which these individuals resided, and that all of the agencies called to consider various aspects of this quagmire, have found and may continue to enjoy true peace beyond what this court can order. "Free will" being what it is, the court hopes the two individuals at the heart of this case also have found and will continue to enjoy the pea ceable existence to which every American is entitled. For the reasons articulated in the attached ruling, Defendants' summary judgment motions are granted, and the court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff' ;s state law claims. Additionally, Plaintiff's motion for a hearing is denied. The Clerk of Court is asked to please enter judgment consistent with this order (and as articulated in the attached ruling), and to please close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 9/25/26. (AV)
350 Motor Vehicle | Connecticut
Exhibit
EXHIBIT Notice of Electronic Video Submission for Settlement Conference Purposes by Bashkim Aliu. (Scricca, Anthony) (Entered: 09/24/2026)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.