Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Jaeckle Fleischmann x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Anti-Trust | New York Southern
Compel
LETTER MOTION to Compel Live Nation Entertainment Inc. et al to produce documents addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian from Conor J. May dated Sep. 24, 2026. Document filed by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia, State Of Connecticut, State Of New York, State of Arizona, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Illinois, State of Maryland, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of South Carolina, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, State of Wisconsin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. A (Requesting States' RFPs), # 2 Exhibit Ex. B (Requesting States' Interrogatories), # 3 Exhibit Ex. C (Defs.' 8.28.26 Ltr), # 4 Exhibit Ex. D (States' 9.2.2026 Ltr), # 5 Exhibit Ex. E (Defs.' 9.16.26 Ltr), # 6 Exhibit Ex. F (Parties' Email Corresp.)).(May, Conor)
Order on Motion to Seal
ORDER granting 2553 Letter Motion to Seal. The Court is in receipt of the letter at Dkt. No. 2554 filed by the Winn-Dixie Plaintiffs requesting to file under seal and in redacted form their opposition to Keurig's fee petition (Dkt. No. 2554-1 (the "Opposition")) and attached exhibits (Dkt. Nos. 2554-2; 2554-3; 2554-4; 2554-5; 2554-6; 2554-7 (the "Exhibits")) to "protect the confidentiality interests of Winn-Dixie and Keurig" related to attorney work product including "confidential pricing information[.]" (Dkt. No. 2541 (the "Third Sealing Request")). The Court notes that the letter at Dkt. No. 2553 is a duplicate of Dkt. No. 2554. Given that the Opposition and Exhibits reflect attorney work product including "confidential pricing information[,]" the Winn-Dixie Plaintiffs submitted publicly available versions of the Opposition and Exhibits with the confidential information redacted, and "[t]he protection of attorney work product is sufficiently important to justify sealing[,]" Interactive Brokers LLC v. Wong, No. 26 Civ. 6579 (GHW), 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192982, at *1 (Aug. 19, 2026), the Third Sealing Request is GRANTED. The Opposition at Dkt. No. 2542 and the Exhibits at Dkt. Nos. 2542-1; 2542-2; 2542-3; 2542-4; 2542-5 shall remain under seal. By September 25, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. ET, counsel for the Winn Dixie Plaintiffs shall email courtesy copies of the unredacted versions of the Opposition and Exhibits to Chambers at cave_nysdchambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. Nos. 2553 and 2554. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave on 9/24/2026) (ar)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.