Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Kagan Lubic
-
Order | Filed: June 04, 2024 | Entered: June 04, 2024 Girotto v. Jonathan Simkhai Inc. et al
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | New York Southern
Stipulation and Order ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys for the parties hereto that: 1. The time within which Defendant JONATHAN SIMKHAI INC., a New York corporation, d/b/a SIMKHAI SOHO NEW YORK, may answer, move, or otherwise respond to the AMENDED COMPLAINT is hereby extended through, and including, June 28, 2024; 2.This is the fourth request for an extension of time in connection with this action, and the first request with respect to the AMENDED COMPLAINT; and; 3. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts and a facsimile signature is deemed to have the same force and effect as an original signature for all purposes. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 6/4/2024) Jonathan Simkhai Inc. answer due 6/28/2024. (ks)
-
Misc | Filed: June 04, 2024 | Entered: June 04, 2024 Girotto v. Jonathan Simkhai Inc. et al
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | New York Southern
Notice to Court Regarding Voluntary Dismissal
***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. 26 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge Katherine Polk Failla for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (km)
-
Misc | Filed: June 03, 2024 | Entered: June 03, 2024 Girotto v. Jonathan Simkhai Inc. et al
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | New York Southern
Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Brown Harris Stevens NYS, LLC and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Brown Harris Stevens NYS, LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Sung, Frederick)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login