Case Activity (408)

1. Order | Filed: July 27, 2026 | Entered: July 27, 2026 Alfredo Gonzales v. Target Corporation et al

   Civil Rights: Jobs | California Central

   Partial Summary Judgment

   MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS; OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART DEFENDANT'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS; AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 23 ) by Judge Michelle Williams Court Granting 23 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment: For the foregoing reasons, the Court ORDERS the following: 1. Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 24-2) is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections (Dkt. No. 24-3) are OVERRULED; 3. Defendant's Evidentiary Objections (Dkt. No. 25-6) are SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; 4. The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 23) on Plaintiff's claims for retaliation, failure to prevent retaliation, wrongful termination, and on Plaintiff's request for punitive damages on all of his claims. (see document for further details) (bm)

2. Filed: July 23, 2026 | Entered: July 23, 2026 Alfredo Gonzales v. Target Corporation et al

   Civil Rights: Jobs | California Central

   Text Only Scheduling Notice

   (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 23 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Michelle Williams Court: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion, noticed for hearing on July 24, 2026, have been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY

3. 406 additional result(s)