Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Kjar Mckenna x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | California Central
Accelerate Protective Order
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 62 by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Discovery has not yet commenced in this case and neither party has sought discovery. Therefore, the Court finds that no good cause exists to enter a protective order. To the extent Plaintiffs argue that pre-discovery filings include information related to minors, California and federal law protect the confidentiality of juvenile records. Finding no good cause, Plaintiffs' Request is denied. (kh)
Declaration
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (DKT. 156); NOTICE OF EXECUTED PROOFS OF SERVICE; AND REQUEST TO DISCHARGE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, 156 filed by Plaintiff Samer Masher. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(san)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.