Case Activity (45)

1. Order | Filed: July 23, 2026 Succow et al v. Bondi et al

   Civil Rights: Other | Connecticut

   Order

   ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court finds that the Defendants have proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the Federal Framework and the Connecticut Framework are constitutional and do not violate Plaintiffs 9; Second or Fourteenth Amendment rights.
   
   The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the State Defendants and the Police Chief Defendants on Count One, and in favor of Defendant Blanche on Count Two. Defendant Blanche's second motion to dismiss and objection to Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction at ECF No. 91 is denied as moot. Following entry of judgment, the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/23/2026. (GV)

2. Response | Filed: July 02, 2026 | Entered: July 02, 2026 Succow et al v. Bondi et al

   Civil Rights: Other | Connecticut

   Response

   RESPONSE re 153 Order,, filed by Todd Blanche. (Larson, John)

3. 43 additional result(s)