Law360 - The Newswire for Business Lawyers

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Law360 Law360
  Sign In

Law360

|

The Practice of Law

Access to Justice Aerospace & Defense Appellate Asset Management Banking Bankruptcy Benefits California Cannabis Capital Markets Class Action Colorado Commercial Contracts Competition Compliance Connecticut Construction Consumer Protection Corporate Criminal Practice Cybersecurity & Privacy Delaware Employment
Energy Environmental Fintech Florida Food & Beverage Georgia Government Contracts Health Hospitality Illinois Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Legal Ethics Legal Industry Life Sciences Massachusetts Media & Entertainment Mergers & Acquisitions Michigan Native American
New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Private Equity Product Liability Project Finance Public Policy Real Estate Retail & E-Commerce Securities Sports & Betting Tax Technology Telecommunications Texas Transportation Trials Washington White Collar

Law360 Pulse

|

Business of Law

California Pulse Connecticut Pulse Courts DC Pulse Daily Litigation Delaware Pulse
Florida Pulse Georgia Pulse In-House Insights Legal Tech & AI Mid-Law
Modern Lawyer New Jersey Pulse New York Pulse Pennsylvania Pulse Small Law Texas Pulse

Law360 Authority

|

Deep News & Analysis

Tax Authority

Federal International State & Local

Employment Authority

Discrimination Labor Other Wage & Hour

Insurance Authority

General Liability Other Property Specialty Lines

Real Estate Authority

Commercial Other Residential

Bankruptcy Authority

Large Cap Mid Cap

Healthcare Authority

Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & Compliance

Law360 Global Products

Law360 UK

Commercial Litigation UK Corporate Crime & Compliance UK Employment UK
Financial Services UK Insurance UK Intellectual Property UK
Pulse UK Transactions UK

Law360 Australia

Commercial Disputes AU Financial Services AU

Close
  • Law360
  • Law360 UK
  • Law360 Pulse
  • Law360 Employment Authority
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 Insurance Authority
  • Law360 Real Estate Authority
  • Law360 Healthcare Authority
  • Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
  • Products
  • Lexis®
  • Law360 Tax Authority
  • Law360 In-Depth
  • Law360 Podcasts
  • Rankings
  • Leaderboard Analytics
  • Regional Powerhouses
  • Law360's MVPs
  • Women in Law Report
  • Law360 400
  • Diversity Snapshot
  • Practice Groups of the Year
  • Rising Stars
  • Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
  • Sections
  • Adv. Search & Platform Tools
  • About all sections
  • Browse all sections
  • Banking
  • Bankruptcy
  • Class Action
  • Competition
  • Employment
  • Energy
  • Expert Analysis
  • Insurance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Product Liability
  • Securities
  • Beta Tools
  • Track docs
  • Track attorneys
  • Track judges
  • Site Menu
  • Join the Law360 team
  • Search legal jobs
  • Learn more about Law360
  • Read testimonials
  • Contact Law360
  • Sign up for our newsletters
  • Law360 Company
  • About Law360 Authority
  • Resource Library
  • Site Map
  • Help
Intellectual Property Securities Bankruptcy Competition Pulse Artificial Intelligence Law360 UK || See all sections ||

Searching dockets in Lamarche Safranko

 

Please assign a name to this alert

All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes

Case Activity (387)

  1. Order | Filed: September 16, 2026 | Entered: September 17, 2026 The Research Foundation for the State University of New York v. Inpria Corporation et al

    Contract: Other | New York Northern

    Order on Letter Request

    TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to the Hearing held on 9/16/2026 and as specifically set forth on the record at that Hearing: (1) as to Letter Motion 383 , the Court once again sets a motion schedule, in that, (a) Defendants may file an appropriate motion by 9/30/2026, (b) Plaintiff shall respond by 10/14/2026, and (c) an In Person Hearing is scheduled for 10/22/2026 at 11:30 a.m., In Person, in Binghamton, New York; (2) The Court Re-Opens the Fact Discovery Phase and Depositions phase for the reasons set forth on the record; (3) (a) Defendants are authorized to file an Omnibus Discovery Motion by 10/2/2026, (b) Plaintiff shall file a Response by 10/16/2026, and (c) a Hearing is scheduled for 10/22/2026 at 11:30 a.m., In Person, in Binghamton, New York; (4) the Court finds good cause to Re-Open the Fact Discovery Phase and Depositions phase, as set forth at the Hearing and also for the following reasons, (a) Plaintiff has violated this Courts Discovery Orders multiple times including the ESI Order, Fact Discovery completion Order, and Orders to compel discovery, (b) Plaintiff has intentionally engaged in non-compliance with Court Orders, (c) Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff have engaged in misconduct in this litigation, including making false statements to the Court, and (d) Defendants have been substantially prejudiced during the Fact Discovery phase due to misconduct and violations by Plaintiff; (5) No later than 9/23/2026, the parties shall file detailed Status Reports advising the Court as to the four topics discussed at the Hearing, that being, (a) the Letter Motion 383 issues that the parties had allegedly resolved, (b) the deposition of Richard Agnello issue, (c) the deposition of Matthew Mroz issue, and (d) serving of subpoenas on LAM and serving deposition notices on LAM representatives; (6) the 9/29/2026 scheduled Hearing is cancelled; (7) The following deadlines which have not expired are STAYED and will be re-set in due course, (a) Defendants 9/29/2026 deadline for disclosure of Defendants Responding Party Expert Reports, (b) All Rebuttal Expert Report disclosure deadline, (c) deadline (10/30/2026) for completion of all Expert depositions, (d) the all Discovery deadline (10/30/2026), and (e) the 12/7/2026 Dispositive Motions filing deadline; (8) Letter Motions 415 & 422 requesting sealing are GRANTED pursuant to N.D.N.Y. Local Rule 5.3 and the Court finds that under the legal standard set forth in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga Cty., 435 F.3d 110, 125-26 (2d Cir. 2006), such sealing is (1) essential to preserve values higher than a qualified First Amendment right of access to the material and (2) narrowly tailored to serve that interest; the Court finds that the parties possess a strong privacy interest in the information set forth in the filings; and (9) the clerk is directed to file under SEAL on the docket the following docket filings, 402 -27 (Ex. 26) affiliated with the Cardineau Opposition, 401 -4 (Ex. 2) and 401 -6 (Ex. 4) affiliated with the Privilege Log Opposition, 402 -2 (Ex. 1), 402 -3 (Ex. 2), 402 -4 (Ex. 3), 402 -5 (Ex. 4), 402 -6 (Ex. 5), Minutes | Filed: September 16, 2026 | Entered: September 17, 2026 The Research Foundation for the State University of New York v. Inpria Corporation et al

    Contract: Other | New York Northern

    Pretrial Conference - Interim

    TEXT Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric: an on the record Hearing was held on 9/16/2026, In Person, in Binghamton, New York. The Court addressed with the parties the issues and topics as raised by the parties in Status Reports 420 & 421 . The Court heard from all counsel regarding 420 & 421 . The Court also addressed with the parties, again, the issues raised in Defendants Letter Motion 383 . At the previous Hearing on 8/28/2026, the Court authorized Defendants to file by 9/11/2026 a motion concerning the issues set forth in Letter Motion 383 . See Text Order 392 . The Court did not receive such a motion filing by 9/11/2026. In their Status Reports at 420 & 421 , the parties advised the Court that on 9/3/2026 & 9/4/2026 Plaintiff and Defendants had mutually resolved and agreed in resolution of all issues raised in Defendants Letter Motion 383 and that therefore motion practice was unnecessary. At commencement of the hearing today, Defendants advised the Court that Plaintiff advised Defendants just before the start of todays hearing that Plaintiff no longer agreed to those agreements and resolution of the 383 issues. Therefore, the Court set a new schedule for motions concerning the Dkt. No. 383 issues and a new hearing date. The hearing previously scheduled for 9/29/2026 is cancelled. The Court STAYED various deadlines and schedules as set forth on the record and for the reasons set forth therein. The Court re-opened the Fact Discovery phase and depositions phase for the reasons set forth on the record. The Court set forth an Omnibus Motion filing schedule for the filing of discovery based motions by Defendants. A Hearing is scheduled for 10/22/2026 at 11:30 a.m., In Person, in Binghamton, New York. The Court sealed various docket entries at request of Plaintiff and Defendants. Appearances: A. Safranko, Esq., J. Nelson, Esq., J. Priddy, Esq., J. Schiltz, Esq., and J. Gleason, Esq., for Plaintiff; J. Bennett, Esq., M. DAgostino, Esq., P. Citroen, Esq., E. Dittmann, Esq., and I. Ashkenazi, Esq., for Defendants; and FTR Recorded. (jdc)

  2. 385 additional result(s)

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Archive of over 450,000 articles
  • Database of over 2.1 million cases
  • Full-text search of patent complaints
  • Full-text search of PTAB cases and documents
  • Database of TTAB cases and documents, including full-text search of documents
  • Customized email alerts and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View full search results

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Register Now!

Sign up now for free access to this content

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.

You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.

We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Register

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In
RELX Group Lexis Nexis

© 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Careers at Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Trust Center | Cookie Settings | Processing Notice | Ad Choices | Help | Site Map | Resource Library | Law360 Company | Testimonials