Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Liddle & Robinson
-
Misc | Filed: March 27, 2024 | Entered: March 27, 2024 Ramales et al v. Bagel and Bean Inc. et al
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern
Satisfaction of Judgment
SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT re: 139 Default Judgment, entered In favor of Salvador Flores, Angel Diaz, Eliezer Ramales, Jorge Flores, Dionisio Ramales, Omar Ramales, Roberto Tovar, Javier Barrales, Samuel Capulin, Balkar Singh, Rosendo Carreto, Against Jay Patel in the amount of $1,540,468.13. Judgment satisfied on March 27, 2024. Document filed by Javier Barrales, Samuel Capulin, Rosendo Carreto, Angel Diaz, Jorge Flores, Salvador Flores, Dionisio Ramales, Eliezer Ramales, Omar Ramales, Balkar Singh, Roberto Tovar. (tp)
-
Misc | Filed: March 27, 2024 | Entered: March 27, 2024 Ramales et al v. Bagel and Bean Inc. et al
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern
Proposed Satisfaction of Judgment
PROPOSED FULL SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT. Satisfaction of Judgment to be Mailed by the Court. Document filed by Javier Barrales, Samuel Capulin, Rosendo Carreto, Angel Diaz, Jorge Flores, Salvador Flores, Dionisio Ramales, Eliezer Ramales, Omar Ramales, Balkar Singh, Roberto Tovar..(Sojo, Catalina) Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers).
-
Misc | Filed: March 27, 2024 | Entered: March 27, 2024 Ramales et al v. Bagel and Bean Inc. et al
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Southern
Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Proposed Satisfaction of Judgment
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PROPOSED SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT: Notice to Attorney Catalina Sojo. RE-FILE Document No. 143 Proposed Satisfaction of Judgment. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): (1) the PDF attached to the docket entry for the proposed satisfaction of judgment is the wrong document (Caption Does Not Match); (2) the proposed satisfaction of judgment lists the wrong name in the caption for the plaintiff. Re-file the document using the event type Proposed Satisfaction of Judgment found under the event list Proposed Orders - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF that lists the following - the correct entry date of the judgment, the correct name of the party(ies) the judgment is in favor of, the correct name of the party(ies) the judgment is against, the correct amount of the judgment - and is notarized. (tp)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login