Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Lindabury Mccormick x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | New York Southern
Telephone Conference
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gregory H. Woods, sitting Part I: Telephone Conference held on 9/10/2026. (Court Reporter Present) (va)
Order
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER re: 182 LETTER MOTION to Seal re Reply in Support of its Application by Order to Show Cause for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woo ds from Jacob R. Dean dated 09/18/2026. filed by Guidepoint Global, LLC, 187 LETTER MOTION to Seal re Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of its Application by Order to Show Cause for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction [ 182, 183] addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Ricardo from Jacob R. Dean date filed by Guidepoint Global, LLC, 155 LETTER MOTION to Seal addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Jacob R. Dean dated September 9, 2026. filed by Guidepoint Global, LLC. For the reasons stated above, Guidepoint's application for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants Elliott, Telo, and Giordano are ENJOINED from: As further set forth herein. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Guidepoint's request that Defendant Giordano make her electronic devices available for computer forensic imaging is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Guidepoint's letter motions to seal materials filed in suppor t of the TRO application, Dkts. 155, 187, and the TRO Defendants' letter motion to seal materials filed in response to the TRO application, Dkt. 182, are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motions at Dkts. 155, 182, and 187. Although Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) requires that the Court issue a temporary restraining order "only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained," the TRO Defendants have voluntarily waived the bond requirement. See TRO at 30 (citing employment contracts). As such, Guidepoint is not required to post bond at this time. See Int'l Bus. Machines Corp. v. De Freitas Lima, No. 20-CV-04573 (PMH), 2020 WL 5261336, at *15 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 2020), aff'd, 833 F. App'x 911 (2d Cir. 2021). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 10/8/2026) (jjc)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.