Case Activity (439)

1. Order | Filed: July 27, 2026 | Entered: July 27, 2026 Moody v. New York Metropolitan Baseball Club, Inc. et al

   Civil Rights: Other | New York Eastern

   Status Report Order

   ORDER: The Court has not yet placed this case on a list of trial-ready cases where a pro se party is seeking pro bono counsel. Appointment of counsel in civil cases is reserved for exceptional circumstances. See, e.g., Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 310 (1989). One of the prerequisites to appointing counsel is that a pro se plaintiff is unable to find counsel on their own. See, e.g., Herbert v. Sanfeliz, 22-CV-4299, 2025 WL 2939265 at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2025) ("Plaintiff must show that he has made a 'reasonably diligent effort under the circumstances' before appointment of counsel will be considered.") (quoting Jenkins v. Chem. Bank, 721 F.2d 876, 880 (2d Cir. 1983)). Here, Plaintiff recently reported to the Chambers via email that she has only just begun to search for an attorney. Before taking further steps to appoint counsel, the Court must be satisfied that Plaintiff has made a sufficient effort to find counsel on her own. Plaintiff shall file a status letter by 8/25/2026 reporting what efforts she has taken to try to find counsel. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Seth D. Eichenholtz on 7/27/2026. (DC)

2. Answer | Filed: July 22, 2026 | Entered: July 24, 2026 Pacific Services Establishment et al v. Djunic et al

   Other Fraud | New York Southern

   Answer to Amended Complaint

   DEFENDANT DANKO DJUNIC'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT to 51 Amended Complaint, with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Danko Djunic. (jjc)

3. 437 additional result(s)