Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Montgomery Mccracken x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
P.I.: Other | Pennsylvania Eastern
Vacate
MOTION to Vacate filed by DOUGLAS R. GROSSINGER.Memorandum and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Ex A, # 3 Exhibit Ex B, # 4 Exhibit Ex C, # 5 Exhibit Ex D, # 6 Exhibit Ex E, # 7 Exhibit Ex F, # 8 Exhibit Ex G, # 9 Exhibit Ex H, # 10 Exhibit Ex I, # 11 Exhibit Ex J, # 12 Exhibit Ex K, # 13 Exhibit Ex L, # 14 Exhibit Ex M, # 15 Exhibit Ex N, # 16 Exhibit Ex O, # 17 Exhibit Ex P, # 18 Exhibit Ex Q, # 19 Exhibit Ex R, # 20 Exhibit Ex S, # 21 Exhibit Ex T, # 22 Exhibit Ex U, # 23 Exhibit Ex V, # 24 Exhibit Ex W, # 25 Exhibit Ex X)(BOCHETTO, GEORGE)
Anti-Trust | New Jersey
Text Order
TEXT ORDER: The settlement conference held on 9/9/2026, (see Dkt. No. 406 ), did not resolve this matter. The undersigned intends to continue ex parte settlement discussions with the parties following disposition of Defendant's pending Motion to Amend. (See Dkt. No. 321 ). Considering this Court's precedents regarding Rule 15 futility analyses, see, e.g.,, Ricketts v. City of Paterson, No. 25-1601, 2026 WL 2286458, at *2 (D.N.J. Aug. 6, 2026) ("[I]t is well-settled law that futility arguments are dispositive arguments that are better suited for consideration in a motion to dismiss."); Colombo v. Bd. of Educ. for the Clifton Sch. Dist., No. 11-785, 2016 WL 6403081, at *2 (D.N.J. Oct. 27, 2016) ("In the interests of judicial economy and in the absence of undue prejudice, the Court may decline to engage in a detailed futility analysis where the Court finds that these arguments are better suited for consideration in the context of a motion to dismiss."), no later 9/23/2026, Plaintiff shall advise the Court in writing whether Plaintiff consents to the filing of Defendant's proposed Amended Answer, Counterclaims, and Third-Party Complaint. (See Dkt. No. [322-1]). The parties shall file their joint dispute letter regarding subject-matter waiver no later than 9/14/2026. The Court will hold an in-person status conference in Courtroom 9 of the Frank R. Lautenberg U.S. Post Office and Courthouse at 2 Federal Square in Newark, NJ 07102 on 1/13/2027 at 12 p.m. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cari Fais on 9/11/2026. (qa, )
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.