Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Paykin Law x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | New York Eastern
Scheduling Order
SCHEDULING ORDER: The District Court having issued a decision 26 on the motions to dismiss, an Initial Conference will be held on December 14, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. before the undersigned. Counsel for all parties must participate and shall connect to the conference through dial in number 571-353-2301 with ID # 771869760. The parties shall file the proposed Discovery Plan Worksheet 8 by December 10, 2026. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 10/8/2026. (JJT)
Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. For the stated reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART to the following extent: I. As to Singh's Motion (ECF No. 24): A. It is GRANTED as to: 1. The Conversion Claim, only to the extent it is asserted against Singh; 2. The Tortious Interference with Clients Claim; and 3. The Unjust Enrichment Claim; and B. It is DENIED as to: 1. The DTSA Claim; 2. The State Law Misappropriation Claim; 3. The Singh Breach of Contract Claim; 4. The Conversion Claim, only to the extent it is asserted against Gumball; 5. The CFAA Claim; 6. The Aiding and Abetting Claim; and 7. The Tortious Interference with Contract Claim. II. As to Music's Motion (ECF No. 24-1): A. It is GRANTED as to: 1. The Music Breach of Contract Claim, to the extent it asserts breaches related to Music's alleged TaxMagnet work or diversion of Everflow payments; 2. The Conversion Claim; 3. The Faithless Servant Claim, to the extent it is based on Music's alleged TaxMagnet work or diversion of Everflow payments; 4. The Usurpation Claim; and 5. The Unjust Enrichment Claim; and B. It is DENIED as to: 1. The DTSA Claim; 2. The State Law Misappropriation Claim; 3. The Music Breach of Contract Claim, to the extent it is based on the confidentiality and nondisclosure provisions of the Music Offer Letter and NDA; and 4. The Faithless Servant Claim, to the extent it is based on Music's alleged coordination with the Singh Defendants. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 10/7/2026. (CV)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.