Minutes | Filed: September 18, 2026
| Entered: September 18, 2026
Pacmar Technologies LLC, fka Martin Defense Group, LLC, et al. v. Kao, et al.
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | Hawaii
Link
EO: ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TIFFANY JENNIFER LAM'S PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE
  Following a hearing held on July 14, 2026 ("7/14/26 Hearing"), this Court issued an entering order on July 20, 2026 ("7/20/26 EO") that, inter alia, directed Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant PacMar Technologies LLC, formerly known as Martin Defense Group, LLC ("PacMar") and Defendant Tiffany Jennifer Lam ("Lam") to file a joint statement with a proposed briefing schedule following the deposition of Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant Martin Kao's ("Kao"). [Dkt. no. 365 at PageID. 8285.] Pursuant to the 7/20/26 EO, PacMar and Lam filed a joint statement on July 31, 2026 ("7/31 Statement") informing this Court that Kao's deposition had been continued, but that a new date had not been scheduled. [Dkt. no. 371 at 2 (citation omitted).] The 7/31 Statement also proposed a briefing schedule, which would be "triggered by receipt of the official transcript" for Kao's deposition. [Id. at 3-4.]
  In an entering order filed on August 6, 2026, this Court rejected the 7/31 Statement's proposed briefing schedule and directed the parties to file a joint statement within two business days of receiving the official transcript for Kao's deposition. [Dkt. no. 373 at PageID.8383.] On September 15, 2026, PacMar and Lam filed a joint statement ("9/15 Statement") with a proposed supplemental briefing schedule. [Dkt. no. 380.]
  The Court APPROVES the 9/15 Statement's proposed briefing schedule. See 9/15 Statement at 1. PacMar and Lam are ORDERED to file their respective supplemental memoranda by October 1, 2026. PacMar and Lam shall file their respective response memoranda by October 30, 2026. No replies will be permitted. The supplemental memoranda shall not exceed twenty-five pages and the responses shall not exceed fifteen pages.
  Any supplemental concise statements of facts filed in support of or in opposition to the memoranda shall be limited to: 1) issues discussed in this Court's 7/20/26 EO; 2) issues discussed at the 7/14/26 Hearing; and 3) facts arising from or relating to Kao's deposition. Once the parties have filed their memoranda, this Court will determine whether to hold a hearing. If this Court determines that a hearing is not necessary, it will take the matter under advisement and will issue a written order addressing PacMar's claims against Lam.
  IT IS SO ORDERED.
(SENIOR JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI)(cgc)
COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)