Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Steckler Wayne x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Patent | Washington Western
2 - Minute Order ~Util - Set/Reset Motion Noting Date ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines ~Util - Terminate Motions
MINUTE ORDER made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable TanaLin, United States District Judge:(1) Pursuant to the Parties' Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 165 ) and in accordance with the with Section V of the Court's Standing Order for All Civil Cases, It is hereby ORDERED that the Parties shall submit a stipulated dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), within forty-five (45) days from the dateof this Order.(2) If the Parties do not submit a stipulated dismissal by the above deadline, the Court will enter its standard order of post-settlement dismissal, allowing the Parties to reopen the case if they have not perfected the settlement agreement within sixty (60) days of the dismissal order.(3) It is further ORDERED that all pending deadlines and hearing dates in this case,including the trial date, are VACATEED.(4) The pending Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 145 ), Motion for Stay (Dkt. No. 146 ), and Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 158 ) are STAYED pending further order of the Court.(5) As for the unresolved Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 149 ), it appears to addressexhibits and an unredacted opposition brief associated with the unresolved Motion to Stay. The Court has not addressed the Motion to Stay and has not relied on the provisionally sealed documents (Dkt. Nos. 152 to 152 -4) in any way. Even so, pursuant to LCR 5(g) and the strong presumption of public access to the court's files, the Court is hesitant to allow documents to remain sealed on the record without a ruling on the merits of the motion to seal, even with a settlement. If, due to the Parties' settlement, all Parties agree to the documents remaining off of the public record without a specific ruling on the merits of the motion to seal, Plaintiff (as the Party requesting the documents be sealed) is directed to file a stipulated notice withdrawing the motion to seal and the related provisionally sealed documents pursuant to LCR 5(g)(6). The Court will then strike the withdrawn docket entries without deciding on the merits of the motion to seal. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file, by 9/10/2026, one of the following: (a) an unopposed motion to withdraw the Motion to Seal and the documents at issue; (b) an unopposed motion to strike the Motion to Seal and unseal the related documents; (c) a notice indicating that the Parties prefer to have the Court rule on the Motion to Seal as presented or cannot reach agreement on this matter.(6) The Clerk is DIRECTED to reset the Motion to Seal (Dkt. No. 149 ) for 9/10/2026. (CJS)
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | Texas Northern
Scheduling Order
AGREED AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/15/2027. Motions due by 6/15/2027. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/4/2026) (cea)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.