-
Response | Filed: July 23, 2026
| Entered: July 23, 2026
IN RE: Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation
Anti-Trust | Wisconsin Eastern
Response (Non-Motion)
RESPONSE filed by City of Alburquerque, City of Allentown, City of Bellingham, City of Des Moines, City of Emeryville, City of Green Bay, City of Hartford, City of Oakland, City of Oxnard, City of Pittsburgh, City of Portland, City of Portsmouth, City of Santa Clara, City of Tacoma, City of Tampa, City of Tempe, City of Tucson, City of Tuscaloosa, City of Yonkers, Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, County of Butte California, County of Los Angeles, County of San Diego, County of Shasta, Ebbetts Pass Fire Protection District, Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, People of the State of California((26-cv-632) acting by and through the Los Angeles County Counsel), People of the State of California((26-cv-635) acting by and through the Office of County Counsel, County of San Diego), People of the State of California((26-cv-729) acting by and through the San Diego City Attorney's Office), San Diego County Fire Protection District, The City of Santa Barbara, Town of Gilbert, Unified Fire Authority, County of Butte California, City of Hartford, City of Tempe, Ebbetts Pass Fire Protection District, City of Portsmouth, Unified Fire Authority, City of Oakland, City of Des Moines, City of Tuscaloosa, The City of Santa Barbara, City of Alburquerque, City of Allentown, City of Bellingham, City of Yonkers, City of Green Bay, City of Pittsburgh, City of Tacoma, County of San Diego, People of the State of California(acting by and through the Office of County Counsel, County of San Diego), San Diego County Fire Protection District, City of Santa Clara, City of Emeryville, County of Shasta, City of Tucson, People of the State of California(acting by and through the San Diego City Attorney's Office), The City of San Diego, City of Oxnard, City of Portland, Town of Gilbert, Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, County of Los Angeles, People of the State of California(acting by and through the Los Angeles County Counsel), City of Tampa re (171 in 1:25-cv-01252-WCG) Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Certification of Compliance with Order (ECF No 171) Associated Cases: 2:26-md-03179-WCG et al.(Stevens, Lindsay)
-
Response | Filed: July 23, 2026
| Entered: July 23, 2026
In re: Fire Apparatus Antitrust Litigation
Anti-Trust | Wisconsin Eastern
Response (Non-Motion)
RESPONSE filed by City of Alburquerque, City of Allentown, City of Bellingham, City of Des Moines, City of Emeryville, City of Green Bay, City of Hartford, City of Oakland, City of Oxnard, City of Pittsburgh, City of Portland, City of Portsmouth, City of Santa Clara, City of Tacoma, City of Tampa, City of Tempe, City of Tucson, City of Tuscaloosa, City of Yonkers, Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, County of Butte California, County of Los Angeles, County of San Diego, County of Shasta, Ebbetts Pass Fire Protection District, Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, People of the State of California((26-cv-632) acting by and through the Los Angeles County Counsel), People of the State of California((26-cv-635) acting by and through the Office of County Counsel, County of San Diego), People of the State of California((26-cv-729) acting by and through the San Diego City Attorney's Office), San Diego County Fire Protection District, The City of Santa Barbara, Town of Gilbert, Unified Fire Authority, County of Butte California, City of Hartford, City of Tempe, Ebbetts Pass Fire Protection District, City of Portsmouth, Unified Fire Authority, City of Oakland, City of Des Moines, City of Tuscaloosa, The City of Santa Barbara, City of Alburquerque, City of Allentown, City of Bellingham, City of Yonkers, City of Green Bay, City of Pittsburgh, City of Tacoma, County of San Diego, People of the State of California(acting by and through the Office of County Counsel, County of San Diego), San Diego County Fire Protection District, City of Santa Clara, City of Emeryville, County of Shasta, City of Tucson, People of the State of California(acting by and through the San Diego City Attorney's Office), The City of San Diego, City of Oxnard, City of Portland, Town of Gilbert, Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County, County of Los Angeles, People of the State of California(acting by and through the Los Angeles County Counsel), City of Tampa re (171 in 1:25-cv-01252-WCG) Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Certification of Compliance with Order (ECF No 171) Associated Cases: 2:26-md-03179-WCG et al.(Stevens, Lindsay)
- 58354 additional result(s)