Law360, New York ( December 11, 2014, 12:45 PM EST) -- In toxic tort litigation, the admissibility of expert testimony on causation often presents a dispositive question. Thus, motions to exclude expert testimony on causation are often a make-or-break moment that can put an end to a case before the costs and risks of trial create settlement leverage for even frivolous claims. The Eleventh Circuit's recent decision in Chapman v. Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2014) is a good illustration....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.