Jury Has No Role In Interpreting Farm Law, Pa. Justices Told

Law360, Philadelphia (May 5, 2015, 6:28 PM EDT) -- A jury's input is not needed to determine whether a farm's use of sewage sludge as fertilizer should be shielded from public nuisance lawsuits lodged by a group of nearby residents, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard at oral arguments Tuesday.

James Slaughter of Beveridge & Diamond PC, representing a Synagro Technologies Inc. subsidiary, told the fives justices in Harrisburg that using sewage sludge was a normal agricultural operation entitled to protection under the state's Right to Farm Act.

"Biosolids are recognized as an agricultural fertilizer under many Pennsylvania and federal laws and regulations," he said. "The normal agricultural operation definition in...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!