Weighing Litigation Vs. Arbitration Amid Court Disruptions

Law360 (October 27, 2020, 5:35 PM EDT) -- This spring, major courts around the world suffered delays and temporary closures due to government-imposed COVID-19-related social distancing measures. Many litigants found themselves stuck — unable to advance their cases or, at times, even initiate them.

But as court backlogs persisted, arbitration soldiered on. Private dispute resolution forums kept their doors open, both relying on existing virtual protocols and quickly adopting new ones. As a result, arbitrations saw little, if any, interruption.

These events could cause one to conclude that arbitration — already on the rise[1] — provides the best means to mitigate against the risk of future court disruptions. Historically...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!