HHS Faces Hurdles Revising Medicare Interpretive Rules

Law360 (February 11, 2021, 6:19 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Azar v. Allina Health Services[1] threatens to slow down the Biden administration's ability to issue new interpretations of Medicare statutory and regulatory provisions that alter interpretations previously issued under the Trump administration.

Ordinarily, following the Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association,[2] federal agencies are free under the Administrative Procedure Act to issue revised interpretations of their statutes or regulations — even interpretations that deviate materially from earlier interpretations — without using notice-and-comment rulemaking.

But the Supreme Court's conclusion in Allina that the Medicare Act imposes more expansive notice-and-comment obligations than the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!