The Cincinnati Insurance Co. asked an Illinois federal judge Thursday for a declaratory judgment that it doesn't have to defend a Missouri resort against a putative class of people suing it under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act who are expected to settle their suit for over $1 million.
The owner of an insurance agency who pled guilty to charges he ran a scheme to defraud Ace European Insurance Co. out of more than $4.6 million was sentenced Friday to 87 months in prison for wire fraud and aiding and abetting in the scam he carried on for 11 years.
A Texas federal judge on Friday ruled that an AIG affiliate must defend a pair of waste transportation companies in litigation over environmental cleanup efforts at a Superfund site, holding that no policy exclusions apply to bar coverage.
The Eleventh Circuit on Friday refused to let Nationwide off the hook for an $8 million award over the insurer's failure to settle claims against a policyholder who was hit with a massive judgment in litigation regarding a fatal car crash, finding that a lower court didn't err in its pretrial rulings or jury instructions.
A New York attorney who was sanctioned with the dismissal of a False Claims Act suit against Allstate Insurance Co., FedEx Corp. and dozens of other companies has taken his case to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that a magistrate may have been more concerned about workload than pleading deficiencies.
A Lloyd's of London underwriter facing a claim over a $64 million malpractice award against an attorney from now-defunct Dickstein Shapiro LLP can't defend itself in D.C. court, Mahattan Beachwear LLC, which owns the claim, told the D.C. Circuit on Thursday, because MBW has no ties to the district.
The Eighth Circuit denied a rehearing bid by 3M over Ponzi scheme investment losses on Friday, ignoring 3M's protests that the appeals court essentially interpreted extraneous language into an insurance policy.
Defunct brokerage MF Global's excess insurer Allied World on Thursday hit back at MF Global’s request for a New York bankruptcy court to strike Allied World’s $15 million bond, which a judge had required before the court could consider the insurer's request to arbitrate a coverage dispute in Bermuda.
A Florida federal judge declined Thursday to give his initial approval to a revised deal that would see Banner Life Insurance Co. and two others fork over $3.5 million to resolve litigation over junk faxes, expressing concern about several aspects of the settlement, including a request to expand the class.
National Frozen Foods Corp. asked a Washington federal judge on Wednesday to reject a W.R. Berkley Corp. unit's bid to dismiss or transfer its lawsuit seeking insurance coverage for $3.5 million in damages it says it sustained in a massive recall of frozen peas, asserting that a policy provision requiring disputes to be heard in New York is void.
Insurance company Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. will pay $604 million to acquire London-based specialty insurer Novae Group PLC in an all-cash deal, the companies announced Wednesday, with a team from Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP advising the buyer.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission cannot simply pluck numbers from the air when allowing for higher premiums for workers who don’t participate in wellness programs, AARP Inc. told a D.C. federal judge in oral arguments Thursday.
The liquidation trustee for bankrupt Capitol Bancorp on Wednesday urged the Sixth Circuit to revisit its decision that Indian Harbor Insurance Co. doesn't have to cover claims in an $18.8 million suit against the bank's former officers, asserting that the appeals court's holding is contrary to precedent and upsets established bankruptcy law.
An Illinois federal judge on Wednesday found Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. did not breach its contract when it transferred the assets of a retirement plan to a third party without notice, saying nothing in the contract barred MetLife from selling the company’s 401(k) fund.
A financial services group that has sued to block part of the U.S. Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule asked a Minnesota federal judge on Wednesday to give it a quick win after the regulator said in a related case that it would no longer defend the rule’s ban on class action waivers.
SoftBank Group hopes to raise up to $5 billion through a U.S. bond sale, Siam Commercial has put on hold plans to sell its life insurance business, and South Korean metals company POSCO is selling a stake in KB Financial Group.
The Eighth Circuit on Thursday declined to rehear a Minnesota nurse’s claim that the Minnesota Human Rights Act blocked employer Essentia Health from refusing to cover her son’s sex reassignment surgery, letting lie a May panel decision dismissing most of her suit.
A New York federal judge on Wednesday temporarily declined to rule on National Indemnity Co.’s contention that an arbitration award requires a reinsurer to cover a $5 million settlement with a steel maker, giving NICO time to analyze claims it just learned the reinsurer leveled against it in Brazilian court.
Justice John Paul Stevens discusses Justice Neil Gorsuch, the pitfalls of originalism, and his beloved Chicago Cubs, in the second article based on Law360’s exclusive interview with the legendary jurist.
An Eleventh Circuit panel on Wednesday affirmed a Florida federal court’s ruling that the insurers for a bank accused of enabling a Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA partner’s $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme won’t have to cover a $50 million judgment that the bank consented to with the liquidating trustees of the law firm.
Although enthusiasm abounds, proliferation in the insurtech industry has been slowed by a rusty set of insurance regulations administered on a state-by-state basis. Insurtechs must do their best to navigate these challenges, but there is hope that regulatory change favorable to insurance innovation is on its way, says Heidi Lawson of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC.
In the midst of the worst drug crisis in American history, two key developments this month may have far-reaching impacts on both the underlying liability claims as well as the insurers to whom the defendants are looking to finance hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure, says Adam Fleischer of BatesCarey LLP.
The Second Circuit's recent decision in McCulloch Orthopaedic Surgical Services v. Aetna has important positive implications for medical providers seeking to assert state law claims against health care payers governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and their third-party administrators, say attorneys with Arent Fox LLP.
Differences in law, practice and procedure between the U.S. and U.K. legal systems require policyholders and their captives to carefully consider the applicable law and forum for resolving disputes before entering into an insurance or reinsurance policy or contract containing an international arbitration agreement, say attorneys with Reed Smith LLP.
In the last 18 months, there have been significant strides in the availability and terms of representation and warranty insurance in health care deals. Parties now have access to a cheaper and effective treatment for the diagnoses that can plague such transactions, say attorneys with McGuireWoods LLP.
Since the California Supreme Court's 2011 ruling in Howell v. Hamilton Meats, the case has significantly shaped the litigation landscape, including many high-profile opinions and jury verdicts in its aftermath. It also has significant implications for the Affordable Care Act and plaintiffs’ litigation strategy, says Robert Tyson Jr. of Tyson & Mendes LLP.
Last month, the American Bar Association published revised guidance regarding an attorney’s duty to protect sensitive client material in light of recent high-profile hacks. The first step in compliance is understanding how your data is being stored and accessed. There are three key questions you should ask your firm’s information technology staff and/or external solution vendors, says Nick Holda of PreVeil.
Fifteen years after California's "Right to Repair Act" was passed, the right is now being challenged with two competing lines of authority, both of which are valid California law. Hopefully, the issue will be definitively answered soon, now that the California Supreme Court has accepted McMillan v. Superior Court for hearing, says Jason Feld of Kahana & Feld PC.
It is becoming clear that the disruptive nature of the autonomous vehicle will extend far beyond the automotive industry. Conversations with clients from a variety of industries have provided unique insight into what a future might look like without humans behind the wheel, say Mike Nelson and Trevor Satnick of Eversheds Sutherland.
Read literally, the delay exclusion contained by many commercial property policies would preclude coverage for any loss of revenue incurred, even if the delay is a direct result of a covered cause of loss. However, case precedent shows that it is necessary to reconcile the delay exclusion with the business income or extra expense coverage grant, says Hilary Henkind of Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass.