Analysis

Recent Patent-Eligibility Cases Leave Unanswered Questions

Law360 (March 12, 2018, 9:27 PM EDT) -- In a series of recent decisions, the Federal Circuit has upheld patents and found that they do not claim patent-ineligible abstract ideas or laws of nature, but the rulings have left attorneys pining for more guidance about where the court will draw the line on patent eligibility in future cases.

Three times in the past month, most recently in a Wednesday decision involving forehead thermometers, the appeals court has held that the inventions at issue are patent-eligible because they are not "well-understood, routine and conventional," a...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Exergen Corporation v. Kaz Usa, Inc.


Case Number

16-2315

Court

Appellate - Federal Circuit

Nature of Suit

830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)

Date Filed

July 11, 2016

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.