An Opportunity For High Court To Clarify Trademark Issue

By Mansi Parikh (July 23, 2018, 1:22 PM EDT) -- The Lanham Act is a federal statute enacted in 1946 to prevent trademark infringement, trademark dilution and false advertising. The Lanham Act's likelihood of confusion test is the bulwark for trademark infringement cases. In particular, the act provides that "[a]ny person who ... uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof ... which ... is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, ... shall be liable in a civil action"[1] In order to determine whether a trademark is likely to cause confusion or mistake as to the origin of the goods or services in the mind of an average consumer, the courts generally look at the DuPont factors, articulated by the Federal Circuit in In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.[2]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!