Murder Threat To Judge Isn't Privileged Info, 8th Circ. Says

Law360 (July 23, 2020, 10:49 PM EDT) -- The Eighth Circuit on Thursday affirmed a Minnesota man's conviction of making a murder threat to a federal judge, rejecting his arguments that his statements were privileged because he had been speaking with his attorneys and ruling that threats of violence don't "fall under the scope of attorney-client privilege."

The decision comes days after the identification of the deceased gunman suspected of killing U.S. District Judge Esther Salas' son and wounding her husband at their New Jersey home. The suspect, Roy Den Hollander, was previously involved in a case before Judge Salas, according to the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!