Insurer Seeks Do-Over On Greenberg DQ Bid In Hartford Case
Law360 (October 16, 2020, 5:30 PM EDT) -- An Indiana magistrate who let Greenberg Traurig stay in a trade secrets case for a Hartford insurance unit made "clear errors" when she decided the BigLaw firm never represented its current adversary, defendant OneCIS Insurance Co. said Thursday.
Seeking another shot at removing Greenberg, OneCIS argued in a filing that the judge somehow thought it had not even suggested it was a Greenberg client as it sought to disqualify Hartford's lawyers.
But in fact, OneCIS told the Indiana district court judge overseeing the case, it had submitted to the magistrate ample evidence of Greenberg's "ongoing representation" of OneCIS parent Bureau Veritas...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!