Law360, New York ( October 7, 2014, 10:43 AM EDT) -- On Sept. 26, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed and remanded a New Jersey federal district court's order deciding that a successfully avoided fraudulent transfer that was subject to a recovery order was not property of the debtor-transferor's estate where the debtor-transferor does not have actual possession of the transferred funds.[1] The Third Circuit rejected this conclusion, holding that where a debtor avoids a fraudulent transfer and obtains an order to that effect, it has sufficiently "recovered" the funds so that they are a part of the debtor's estate....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.