Ex-Pa. Justices Drop Judicial Retirement Age Vote Challenge

Law360, Philadelphia (January 9, 2017, 5:31 PM EST) -- The firm representing two former Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices in their fight against what they argued was a misleading ballot referendum to raise the mandatory retirement age for state judges said Friday it would not appeal a recent decision dismissing their challenge.

Sprague & Sprague, which has represented former Justices Ronald Castille and Stephen Zappala Sr. as they pursued challenges to the referendum through both state and federal court, said that it would not appeal a decision last month from U.S. District Judge Robert Mariani throwing...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Sprague et al v. Cortes


Case Number

1:16-cv-02169

Court

Pennsylvania Middle

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Other

Judge

Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner

Date Filed

October 27, 2016

Law Firms

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.