McLane V. EEOC's Impact On Employer Subpoena Responses

By Mark Wiletsky (April 11, 2017, 11:58 AM EDT) -- What standard should apply when an appellate court reviews a district court's decision on whether to enforce a subpoena issued by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission? That is the question recently decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of McLane Co. Inc. v. EEOC, 581 U.S. ___ (2017). All eight justices agreed that the proper standard of review of an EEOC subpoena enforcement decision is abuse of discretion, not de novo review. The only discord among the justices was whether the case needed to be remanded to the Ninth Circuit for analysis under the correct standard of review....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!