Claims And Classes In Medical Monitoring Cases

Law360, New York (January 23, 2014, 1:36 AM EST) -- Since 1984 when the first court recognized the claim, courts have been divided whether to allow a cause of action for medical monitoring. Even now, almost thirty years later, although several courts have allowed a cause of action for medical monitoring absent present physical injury, most other courts require plaintiffs to prove a present injury before recognizing such a claim. In the typical product liability lawsuit, a plaintiff alleges that ingestion or use of a "product" has caused physical harm. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A. The absence of an existing injury is a failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Thus, if courts were to accept plaintiffs' theory that the claimed "injury" is an increased risk of developing an illness or disease, the courts would essentially be creating a new cause of action, which courts are generally unwilling to do....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.

A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!