In Calif., Questions Remain On Law Firm Conflict Waivers

Law360 (September 13, 2018, 2:49 PM EDT) -- In Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP v. J-M Manufacturing Co. Inc.,[1] the California Supreme Court found that Sheppard Mullin's failure to disclose a known conflict with another current client did not categorically disentitle the law firm from recovering the value of the services it rendered to J-M Manufacturing.

In 2016, the California Court of Appeal had found that general advance and current conflict waivers signed by J-M Manufacturing and another current client of the firm did not effectively waive the firm's conflict of interest in connection with a lawsuit in which Shepard Mullin was defending J-M Manufacturing from a qui...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!