Heir Locator's Anti-Per Se Arguments Already Rejected: DOJ
Law360 (January 11, 2019, 7:26 PM EST) -- To salvage a criminal antitrust case against an heir-locating business, the U.S. Department of Justice continued to push a Utah federal judge Thursday to impose the easier-to-prove per se test to show that the company's alleged decision to divvy up its market with a competitor was illegal.
In a filing Thursday to U.S. District Judge David Sam, the DOJ argued that the Tenth Circuit already rejected assertions that would block the case from being considered under the "per se" standard, the only standard under which DOJ policy permits prosecutors to bring antitrust cases.
In this case, however, Judge Sam imposed the rule of reason test to...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!
Kirkland & Ellis LLP has redefined what it means to be the biggest of BigLaw — weighing in at 2,116 attorneys by year end 2018 and becoming the first firm since Law360 began tracking law firm head counts to top 2,000 U.S.-based attorneys.