9th Circ. Doubts Drugmakers' Bid To Revive Free Speech Suit
Law360 (September 14, 2020, 10:24 PM EDT) -- A Ninth Circuit panel appeared skeptical Monday of arguments by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis that district courts can block the Hawaii attorney general's $8 billion consumer protection suit over ads for blood thinner Plavix, with each judge suggesting such an interference would run counter to the "Younger abstention" doctrine.
During a video conferencing hearing, the drugmakers' counsel, Anand Agneshwar of Arnold & Porter, told a three-judge panel that U.S. District Judge Jill Otake erred in concluding in March that the federal court can't interfere with the state's consumer protection lawsuit due to the Younger abstention doctrine, which establishes the principle that...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!