Wary Justices Mull Fed. Courts' Jurisdiction Over Arb. Awards

By Khorri Atkinson (November 2, 2021, 9:02 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court justices seemed skeptical of arguments Tuesday that the Federal Arbitration Act does not give federal courts jurisdiction to confirm or deny arbitration awards, although Chief Justice John Roberts called the century-old law "an odd creature" because the act itself does not establish jurisdiction, unlike most other federal statutes. 

The justices parsed through the arbitration act's technical nuances while examining a Fifth Circuit order from September 2020 finding that a U.S. district court in Louisiana correctly asserted jurisdiction over a bid by onetime financial adviser Denise Badgerow to upend a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration upholding her firing.

Badgerow, who initially...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!