Justices Put Target On Employer Motives In Free Speech Suits

By Jeannie O'Sullivan (April 26, 2016, 9:41 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday that an alleged victim of workplace retaliation can pursue a First Amendment claim based on the mere perception that he was engaged in a constitutionally protected activity exposes employers to greater liability over their motives in free speech suits, experts say.

(Credit: Law360) With a split ruling that allows perceived bias to support a free speech claim, the justices handed a victory to Jeffrey Heffernan, a now-retired Paterson, New Jersey, police officer who claimed he was demoted when his boss saw him holding a campaign sign supporting the incumbent mayor's political rival.

The extension of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!