We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

High Court Skeptical Of Challenge To Terror Review Judges

Law360, Nashville (January 16, 2018, 9:55 PM EST) -- The U.S. Supreme Court gave a skeptical reception to former service members who argued Tuesday they had been impermissibly convicted by judges wrongly serving simultaneously on both a terror conviction review court and a military court, digging into the question of whether the review court judgeships are a civilian role.

An attorney for the ex-military members, Stephen Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law, agreed with concerns raised by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg that under his theory military judges appointed to the...
To view the full article, register now.

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Nicole A. Dalmazzi, Petitioner v. United States


Case Number

16-961

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

Date Filed

February 2, 2017


Case Title

Laith G. Cox, Petitioner v. United States


Case Number

16-1017

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

Date Filed

February 24, 2017


Case Title

Keanu D. W. Ortiz, Petitioner v. United States


Case Number

16-1423

Court

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit

Date Filed

May 30, 2017

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.