China Agritech May Have Limited Practical Effect

By Noelle Reed and Austin Winniford (June 15, 2018, 5:47 PM EDT) -- On Monday, June 11, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in China Agritech v. Resh that a pending class action does not toll the statute of limitations for absent class members who bring a subsequent class action. Although a clear victory for class action defendants, the holding itself may have limited practical effects. The Supreme Court's decision, however, is in line with its recent decisions narrowing the availability of equitable tolling and limiting class actions, which may have broader favorable implications for defendants....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!