How Fed. Circ. Nike Ruling May Change Inter Partes Review

Law360 (August 1, 2018, 3:16 PM EDT) -- On April 24, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court in SAS Institute v. Iancu held that if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board institutes an inter partes review, any final written decision must decide the patentability of all claims challenged in the petition.[1] Central to the court’s reasoning was that "the petitioner's petition ... is supposed to guide the life of the litigation," and "[n]othing suggests the Director enjoys a license to depart from the petition and institute a different inter partes review of his own design."[2]

While the SAS  court held that any final written decision must decide the patentability of...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS