By Robert Salcido, Catherine Creely and Carroll Skehan (September 10, 2018, 12:36 PM EDT) -- In United States ex rel. Rose v. Stephens Institute, a Ninth Circuit panel ruled that False Claims Act relators must satisfy the two-part test for implied false certification claims set out in Universal Health Services Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar. At first glance, this seems like welcome news to FCA defendants. But a closer look reveals that the panel's defective application of Escobar's implied false certification test and materiality standard overshadows this holding. The Ninth Circuit professed to follow Escobar, but its decision ultimately undermines Escobar's fundamental principles by allowing garden-variety regulatory breaches to proceed as FCA cases. If followed, the Ninth Circuit's decision will subvert, rather than effectuate, the FCA's purpose by effectively removing the safeguards Escobar imposed on implied false certification claims....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
