High Court Unlikely To Solve ESA Issues In Frog Habitat Case

By Angela Levin and Andrea Wortzel (October 9, 2018, 3:24 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court kicked off its new term on Oct. 1 with oral arguments in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.[1] The case centers around whether and when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service can designate land unoccupied by a threatened or endangered species as critical habitat for that species under the Endangered Species Act. In this case, the FWS designated more than 1,500 acres of private land in Louisiana as critical habitat for the endangered dusky gopher frog, despite the fact that no frogs currently occupy the area and have not since 1965. Not only is the frog not present on the Louisiana property, the FWS has acknowledged that it could not survive on the property without modifications — referred to by FWS during oral argument as "reasonable efforts" — being made to support the frog's survival on the property....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!